3 ms·
I would say Bevy isn't really similar to Unity. Something like Fyrox - https://fyrox.rs/ https://fyrox.rs/ - would be more similar. Bevy is more low level and l
by CornishPasty 3y ago
I would say Bevy isn't really similar to Unity. Something like Fyrox - https://fyrox.rs/ https://fyrox.rs/ - would be more similar. Bevy is more low level and lacks an editor (as of now, it's planned)
- echelon 3y agoFyrox is a one-person show. It's quite impressive, but it doesn't have the same massive community around it that Bevy does. Bevy has a very stable ECS architecture and is being intelligently designed and built for the long run. Bevy's lead developer is working on the editor now and it's getting closer to landing [1, 2]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35998538 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35998538 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36658488 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36658488
- devoice 3y agoSomeone who needs to start developing right now should use Fyrox right now. I tested the same project in both, and can echo the sentiment that Fyrox is further along and much more similar to classical engines like Godot, Unity or a number of further-along C++ engines. Bevy breaks things every minor release and is missing key features. If more people supported the Fyrox effort, then the rust gamedev ecosystem would be less vulnerable to a change in bevy's pricing structure just as this Unity change has impacted the wider game dev ecosystem.