2 ms·
It seems to depend on the task. I'd say it beats GPT-3 in quality most of the time (but not in speed and cost!) and GPT-4 approximately never. It's perfect if w
by andai 3y ago
It seems to depend on the task. I'd say it beats GPT-3 in quality most of the time (but not in speed and cost!) and GPT-4 approximately never. It's perfect if what you need is "less good than GPT-4 but 50x cheaper."
- wkat4242 3y agoThe biggest benefit of llama is that you can get it uncensored so you don't get the weasely lawyer disclaimer crap all the time.
- andai 3y agoIn my experience the Chat version of Llama 2 is significantly worse than the GPTs, on the "I'm afraid I can't do that" front. It doesn't lecture you as much, but suggests "how about we do [something unrelated and useless] instead?" As for the plain text prediction version (which is the only uncensored one?), I haven't been able to get it to do anything useful, even when I provide examples (seems dumber than even ancient GPT-3?). Also, I got some bizarre and disturbing outputs from the uncensored version, like it was trained on some very nasty inputs! I assume that's why they went so hard on the safety phase to compensate...