4 ms·
Good point -- hopefully the quality impact is still worth it, remains to be seen. Agree on the size -- hopefully something they will keep in mind for future mod
by Palmik 3y ago
Good point -- hopefully the quality impact is still worth it, remains to be seen. Agree on the size -- hopefully something they will keep in mind for future models.
- brucethemoose2 3y agoIf its better than the equivalent 30B model, that's still a huge achievement. Llama.cpp's Q2_K quant is 2.5625 bpw with perplexity just barely better than the next step down: https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/1684 https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/1684 But subjectively, the Q2 quant "feels" worse than its high wikitext perplexity would suggest. That's apples to oranges, as this quantization is different than Q2_K, but I just hope the quality hit in practice isn't so bad.