2 ms·
That's complete nonsense, though obviously not 100% (I'm no sommelier) I could definitely identify some grapes blind (and then implicitly could tell you if it's
by OJFord 3y ago
That's complete nonsense, though obviously not 100% (I'm no sommelier) I could definitely identify some grapes blind (and then implicitly could tell you if it's red or white). And a master sommelier... well they can do that and then some.
If I wasn't sure of the grape, sure I might not confidently say if it's red or white. Because other than visually that isn't really as big a deal as it naïvely seems? Wine doesn't taste 'red' or 'white' it has different flavours and some grapes are red and others are white, but that's really only a visual difference.
(Ok fine some flavours or textures are so much more common in one vs the other that it might allow a solid guess of the colour even if you had no idea of the grape - 'minerally' or 'bready'/'yeasty' tasting/smelling is probably white; very tannic is probably red. But I think my point stands, it's pretty meaningless, and certainty will come from identifying something more specific, and then knowing what colour that is, to satisfy the naïve hater that thinks that's the most important trait.)
- barelysurviving 3y agoWhite wine can also be made from red grapes.
- OJFord 3y agoSure, and maybe you do mean that in agreement, but doesn't that go to my point that the colour isn't really as relevant as someone who thinks it's all a scam and anyone who thinks they like wine is an idiot believes? And some are blends of both, but we'd call the result white or red according to what dominates. Champagne for example.