> p=0.05 is a filter for "worth trying to replicate" Yes, I think that is an excellent way to put it. > The crisis in science is largely that people confuse "

> p=0.05 is a filter for "worth trying to replicate" Yes, I think that is an excellent way to put it. > The crisis in science is largely that people confuse "publishable" with "probably true". I would put it slightly differently: people conflate "published in a top-tier peer-reviewed journal" with "true beyond reasonable dispute". They also conflate "not published in a top-tier peer-reviewed journal" with "almost certainly false." But I think we're in substantial agreement here.