I asked what his point was because his comment really had no relevance to my comment which he was replying to. All my comment did was clarify that the original

I asked what his point was because his comment really had no relevance to my comment which he was replying to. All my comment did was clarify that the original comment regarding foreign nationals having no first amendment rights was not accurate. I could have also pointed out that he was not fully correct because visa applications are also completed within the United States. The judge in the case even agreed that there were first amendment issues regarding those completing applications within the US but in the case of immigration deference should be given to immigration requirements.