3 ms·
I personally find stereo/3d video basically no more immersive than regular video. I wouldn't bother putting a headset just for that. It needs to be like VR 360
by cypress66 3y ago
I personally find stereo/3d video basically no more immersive than regular video. I wouldn't bother putting a headset just for that.
It needs to be like VR 360 video where you can look around to be worth it.
- dmix 3y agoWell I see Vision as just a secondary computing platform like using an iPad. Something you throw on, on the couch after work, and chill for an hour or two messing around, while messaging people in the Vision (sending photos back/forth). So basically you wouldn't need to put it on to watch them but you'd regularly already have it on, instead of, say, watching TV. VR googles for those videos aren't exactly a hard requirement either if you're on the go. If it stops being a novelty like "see this amazing experience in VR" where you hype yourself up and put work on doing it just for that - sure - it's not very amazing. But when it comes normal and integrated into a computing platform you already use daily it's definitely a plus.
- jimmySixDOF 3y agoI don't think they are stopping at today's version of 3D video. https://www.whathifi.com/news/new-godzilla-series-hints-vr-movies-could-pick-up-where-3d-left-off https://www.whathifi.com/news/new-godzilla-series-hints-vr-m...