> It should be noted that, while the subject of this paper is silly, the analysis actually does make sense. This paper, then, is a serious analysis of a ridicul

> It should be noted that, while the subject of this paper is silly, the analysis actually does make sense. This paper, then, is a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is of course the opposite of what is usual in astrophysics From what I can tell, this was published in August of that year, though with the silliness toned down significantly [0] [0] https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/90E8835704DB1C3449B38867D848AB74/S1473550418000198a.pdf/spaceflight-from-super-earths-is-difficult.pdf https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/c...