> Claiming a device a new design when it actually has a few different design elements does not seem like too much of a stretch, for an advertisement I don't pe

> Claiming a device a new design when it actually has a few different design elements does not seem like too much of a stretch, for an advertisement I don't personally see the new design. This is Apple, king of "design" and the designers/creatives go to company (for good reason) but this is not a new design. This is a, moderate at best, alteration. I'm also not saying it has been a bad design, it's just not new, even for them. Maybe it's the advertising world that is tilting me more and more in my later years.