3 ms·
This looks awesome! Tangential question - do you find GPT function calling to work consistently and without error, or do you get errors when using it? By erro
by binarymax 3y ago
This looks awesome! Tangential question - do you find GPT function calling to work consistently and without error, or do you get errors when using it? By errors I mostly mean incorrect function signatures/types or missing values...but if you see other unpredictable behavior that would help too.
- Arctic_fly 3y agoI haven't had much trouble with GPT 3.5 or 4 function calls returning in an undesirable format recently. I did get a few bad syntax responses when OpenAI first rolled it out, but not for the past few months. Llama 2 can also pick the function call format up, given sufficient training data that contains function call responses, though you'll then have to parse the returned object out of the text-based response.
- behnamoh 3y agoHas anyone done such fine tuning on llama though? Afaik most projects like llama.cpp use grammars instead.
- Arctic_fly 3y agoYep! The linked notebook includes an example of exactly that (fine-tuning a 7b model to match the syntax of GPT-4 function call responses): https://github.com/OpenPipe/OpenPipe/blob/main/examples/classify-recipes/3-evaluate.ipynb https://github.com/OpenPipe/OpenPipe/blob/main/examples/clas...
- behnamoh 3y agoThanks!
- llwj 3y agoI see wrong responses about 1% of the time, but I love it, considering parsing raw text output without function calling had a much higher error rate.