3 ms·
What is completely untrue? When the Rust team was let go in 2020, only a very minor part of Servo (Stylo) delivered and became part of FF according to [1]. Yet
by tannhaeuser 3y ago
What is completely untrue? When the Rust team was let go in 2020, only a very minor part of Servo (Stylo) delivered and became part of FF according to [1]. Yet the Rust core team, already notorious for lone language decisions, engaged in what amounted to an epic risk of a publicity catastrophe for Mozilla. And even in their post mortem in [1], they care more about progressing Rust than about their employer or the (much more important) work they were paid for.
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24143819 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24143819
- steveklabnik 3y ago9.6% of Firefox is Rust as of today https://4e6.github.io/firefox-lang-stats/ https://4e6.github.io/firefox-lang-stats/ That is 3.4 million lines. And frankly I am upset by the way you characterize my post there. First of all, as I said, it was in a personal capacity, not a statement from the team. Second, as I was not employed by Mozilla at the time, of course I care more about Rust than I do Mozilla. However, that does not mean that I did not care for those who were let go, we were all very upset at how unfortunate the situation was. And the broader community stepped up and hired everyone, as far as I know. And also language like "already notorious for lone language decisions," that is how both the Rust project and Mozilla wanted it! They actively did not control language decisions, even when Rust was small enough that the only folks who worked on it were at Mozilla. Nobody wanted Rust to be a single vendor technology, because of the exact risk of the situation that came to pass. Imagine if Rust were 100% Mozilla at that time, and they abandoned it. Instead of it being a bump in Rust's development, it would have been a catastrophe. And, your original post: "the entire fsking Rust team." Again, Mozilla employed a very small number of people that made up the overall team. Yes, they were critical people, who did a lot of important work, but "fired the entire team" is straightforwardly inaccurate.