Have to admit, I read the article in full detail only after commenting and I see your point. Especially since the implenting company is called out explicitly f

Have to admit, I read the article in full detail only after commenting and I see your point. Especially since the implenting company is called out explicitly for failing to achieve this, and the risks of changing the well-established identifiers are also illustrated. Perfect might be the enemy of the good then, or the standardization thing at least is a separate topic.