9 ms·
Tangential: syntax-highlighting math! This is the first time I’ve seen it. Not yet sure what I think about it, but I can definitely see the allure.
by nathell 3y ago
Tangential: syntax-highlighting math! This is the first time I’ve seen it. Not yet sure what I think about it, but I can definitely see the allure.
- viscousviolin 3y agoIt's easy on the eyes and it can make reading lots of equations less awkward if done correctly. I remember finding out this was possible while I was working on an assignment in Latex - it looked amazing. It takes a little bit of work to colour in equations but I hope more people start doing it (including me, I'd forgotten about it for a while)
- tetha 3y agoYeah, I like it. I used this as a tutor in more finicky exercises when it becomes really important to keep 2-3 very similar, but different things apart. It takes a bit of dexterity, but you can switch fluently between 3 different whiteboard markers held in one hand while writing, haha. I am kind of wondering if a semantic highlighting makes sense as well. You often end up with some implicit assignment of lowercase latin, uppercase latin, lowercase greek letters and such for certain meanings. Kinematic - xyzt for position in time, T_i(I_i) for the quaternion or transformation representing a certain joint of a robot.
- rendaw 3y agoPedant-man on the scene: this is just highlighting since the highlighting isn't derived from syntax.
- crazygringo 3y agoWhich makes me wonder what that would look like and would it be helpful? But there's already such complex and varied typography in math I wonder if it would be kind of redundant. E.g. you don't need matching parentheses to be colored when they already come in different sets of matching heights.
- andrewprock 3y agoIt's been around for a long time (centuries?). In most textbooks, you'll get different semantics for italic and bold faces. Modern textbooks with color printing often use color in semantic ways.