3 ms·
It is objectively inconsistent, the postulates contradict each other. But for almost a century we did not make any substantial progress, neither resolving the i
by danbruc 3y ago
It is objectively inconsistent, the postulates contradict each other. But for almost a century we did not make any substantial progress, neither resolving the issue theoretically or philosophically, nor experimentally demonstrating any problems. Or at least nothing reached broad consensus.
- bowsamic 3y agoIt's objectively consistent since the postulates do not contradict each other
- danbruc 3y agoThis seems debatable, but let us assume they are not obviously inconsistent. Those postulates only really mean something if you apply them in some situation, and if you apply them as laid out a few comments before, they make inconsistent claims. If applied to the subsystems, they postulate non-unitary evolution of the combined system, if applied to the combined system, they postulate unitary evolution. If inconsistent is to strong of a claim, I guess this could be changed to incomplete, maybe there are missing postulates resolving the issue.