> Every definition of ignore you will find has intention in it https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/ignore https://dictionary.cambridge.org/u

> Every definition of ignore you will find has intention in it https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/ignore https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/ignor... > to intentionally not listen or give attention to: > to give no attention to something or someone: Two definitions - one with intention, one without > words mean things. Yes, but they often mean multiple things. Very few dictionary entries only have a single definition for a word. You can't use "words mean things" to claim that "this word means only what I say it means, regardless of the other accepted uses it already has". > You don’t think it’s important to draw a distinction between whether a robot was deliberately programmed to do something malicious as opposed to a bug which caused an oversight? I do think there are times when it is very important to do that. I just don't think that "ignore" is the right word to make that distinction, and isn't a distinction the authors were trying to make at that particular time, because if they were they would probably have used another word. ...at least, that's how I read it. It seemed clear to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯