> Even the landing page for WinUI starts off by comparing the differences between two versions of it. It feels like they are trying really hard not to annoy de

> Even the landing page for WinUI starts off by comparing the differences between two versions of it. It feels like they are trying really hard not to annoy developers by telling them their stack is now legacy. They should take all old technology and put it on an entirely different docs website. > We've been there before, and intermediate layers between the platform and the developer ultimately produces sub-standard apps and hinders the progress of the platform. > >-- Steve Jobs - https://www.engadget.com/2010-04-10-steve-jobs-responds-to-complaint-about-new-development-tool-rest.html https://www.engadget.com/2010-04-10-steve-jobs-responds-to-c... I've heard Steve say this a few times, and it always caused developer backlash. But having seen how things have played out, I think he was definitely right. Honestly though, Windows should have just gone with HTML. The majority of HTML-based apps are nicer looking and feeling than Windows apps, and the perf is fine. I just don't know how they f'd up XAML/WPF so badly.