4 ms·
Hey, the C language is pretty well scored. I really really loved the C. For me, it's the king/father language. Everything is in it seriously (I mean, types, flo
by FredBrach 15y ago
Hey, the C language is pretty well scored. I really really loved the C. For me, it's the king/father language. Everything is in it seriously (I mean, types, flow controls, memory management etc.), and it's just on top of the assembly language.
I could code with C during centuries I think.
By the way, Ruby is pretty well scored also. I should try it eh. Is it for back-end programming or front-end, native apps? What's the point with it?(Really less code?)
And about Python? Why is it so awesome?
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- wging 15y ago>And about Python? Why is it so awesome? It's concise and powerful. Not as fast as C but if you think 'everything is in it (C) seriously' then you're missing out (except in the sense that the reference implementation of Python is built in C). It's relatively easy to do cool things. Look at http://hyperpolyglot.org/scripting http://hyperpolyglot.org/scripting for good examples. (This will also help you see why Ruby is cool.) Things that knock my socks off are generator expressions (expression(x) for x in iterable if another_expression(iterable)) and indexing (Reverse a string s? s[::-1]. And this notation does generalize...).
- read_wharf 15y ago"And about Python? Why is it so awesome?" Because you already know it. Turn around and look at the pseudo-code on your whiteboard.
- FredBrach 15y agoGenerally my pseudo code looks like: for all for all for all =) I highly prefer engineered coding than syntaxic coding. So there is no code in my white board, only -french- words. Code follow. And unlike mathematic and what most people think, concerning coding, details never stop you. Or really really really rarely. Bad design (=engineering) do and a lot.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]