The article posted above can also be seen via a proxy here: https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Feuobserver.com%2Fgreen-economy%2F157364 https://12ft.io/proxy?

The article posted above can also be seen via a proxy here: https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Feuobserver.com%2Fgreen-economy%2F157364 https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Feuobserver.com%2Fgreen... - the point being, there is a throwback in the quality of energy production, in fact right the anedoctal example is a wind farming taking damage in order to expand the dirtiest type of coal (Lignite contains 25%–35% carbon and has the lowest energy content of all coal ranks.) The most outraging piece to me, is the that in large part the push against modern safer nuclear energy production (that could have mitigated this situation) comes from the Green Party. All mentioned so far comes off political nature, so if your point is the grid is easier to change... i haven't seen a single fact pointing in that way. There is also the engineering appreciation for reducing energy loss vs. pollution it creates; which low quality coal -> high voltage transmission -> EV is an insanely ineffective method all along. Any EV being charged by coal is a pathetic attempt of green wash.