4 ms·
> Somehow we need to get to the point that patients expect doctors Yes, and I think malpractice suits can work well here. If a doctor misdiagnoses a patient, l
by d_burfoot 3y ago
> Somehow we need to get to the point that patients expect doctors
Yes, and I think malpractice suits can work well here. If a doctor misdiagnoses a patient, leading to an injury, s/he needs to be able to document that an AI system was consulted and the AI-generated diagnosis was checked or considered. Maybe there's a good reason to discard the AI's suggestion, but you better at least have asked the AI, or you're going to slapped with a big malpractice penalty.
- readthenotes1 3y agoThe irony is that the lawyers profiting are doing so because they have not been replaced by AI
- ceejayoz 3y agoNot that some aren't trying! https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/08/nyregion/lawyer-chatgpt-sanctions.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/08/nyregion/lawyer-chatgpt-s... > In a cringe-inducing court hearing, a lawyer who relied on A.I. to craft a motion full of made-up case law said he “did not comprehend” that the chat bot could lead him astray. > For nearly two hours Thursday, Mr. Schwartz was grilled by a judge in a hearing ordered after the disclosure that the lawyer had created a legal brief for a case in Federal District Court that was filled with fake judicial opinions and legal citations, all generated by ChatGPT. The judge, P. Kevin Castel, said he would now consider whether to impose sanctions on Mr. Schwartz and his partner, Peter LoDuca, whose name was on the brief.
- drewcoo 3y agoThere should, I would hope, be more to social considerations than litigation.