2 ms·
When I last had to deal with SL (about two years ago at my job back then), it was a nightmare to deal with, and used linux 2.6.9 (!) with literally thousands of
by secure 15y ago
When I last had to deal with SL (about two years ago at my job back then), it was a nightmare to deal with, and used linux 2.6.9 (!) with literally thousands of custom patches. We needed to do some kernel development with it, which was incredibly painful… (since it was totally different than vanilla linux)
Also, it seemed like vastly under-manpowered.
- krunaldo 15y agoSince they just repackage RHEL you were probably just running a 4.x release or a early 5.x release... SL is mostly for people interested in running RHEL but don't want to pay the licensing cost.