> This solution uses the human-readable base58 encoding scheme. How readable is base58 in Arabic or Chinese? I've concluded that only the standard numbers 0123

> This solution uses the human-readable base58 encoding scheme. How readable is base58 in Arabic or Chinese? I've concluded that only the standard numbers 0123456789, algebra symbols +-/*= and phone symbols #* are universal enough for a global encoding. Any other insights are welcomed!