Thank you. I think your question can be similarly answered. With constant surveillance: 1) individuals are incentivized to avoid expressing themselves in ways

Thank you. I think your question can be similarly answered. With constant surveillance: 1) individuals are incentivized to avoid expressing themselves in ways which their overseers dislike, especially if an expression draws punitive measures; 2) a particularly vulnerable person could be worried about being extorted with information that's discovered about them causing some pervasive increase in stress; 3) otherwise innocuous information about a person might indicate a Bad Thing which is only considered Bad well after the fact but might still be used against them in some social setting.