3 ms·
Try F# then, tuples, records, pattern matching, etc. It's essentially OCaml.net
by fleitz 15y ago
Try F# then, tuples, records, pattern matching, etc. It's essentially OCaml.net
- MatthewPhillips 15y agoHave used F# quite a bit. It's nice, the nicest ML I've used, but it has some cruft as well. It feels like 2 languages, really, the nice functional ML language, and then the C#-with-F#-syntax object oriented side. I wish they wouldn't have bothered with the latter.
- pjmlp 15y agoActually the OO side is quite similar to OO in OCaml, so I miss your C# remark there. For a language to be first class in .NET it needs to be able to do OO with the same semantics that the CLR has, otherwise you will have leaky abstractions all over the place.