3 ms·
I call bollocks on that, enforcement is a matter of breaking free of regulatory capture just long enough to implement a system. I am not in the thick of this d
by jimmySixDOF 3y ago
I call bollocks on that, enforcement is a matter of breaking free of regulatory capture just long enough to implement a system. I am not in the thick of this discussion but think of the Number Portability legislation that carriers were forced (through enforcement) to implement and extend that right of ownership model to our data and digital identities so you can not be deplatformed by AI on a filter whim walled off from years of family photo uploads. We should have our own individual terms of service provisions that these platforms have to negotiate and agree in triplicate to before monitizing personally identifiable information to data brokers for hire.
- DrScientist 3y agoWhile I agree change requires determined action to overcome vested interests and inertia - I don't think that doesn't mean it isn't hard. Laws are all about balancing interactions between parties. If you lived on your own there would be no need for laws. Laws police the space between people - where your right to freely do X, impinges on someone's elses right to be free of y. Agreeing and defining that balance in a legally enforceable way is often not so easy as it first appears. But let's be clear - I'm not using it as an excuse not to try.