4 ms·
Artists can copyright their work no matter what. If they create a computer program to scatter paint, they can copyright the output. If I as a programmer do crea
by rnk 3y ago
Artists can copyright their work no matter what. If they create a computer program to scatter paint, they can copyright the output. If I as a programmer do creative work (ie programming), it should have the same support.
This was just a bad decision about copyright, the only reason to support this distinction is to protect art and artists.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> Artists can copyright their work no matter what. If they create a computer program to scatter paint, they can copyright the output. Not if the computer program uses GenAI, at least without disclosing and disclaiming from copyright the GenAI contribution, under the current (absolutely ludicrous) Copyright Office interpretation. > If I as a programmer do creative work (ie programming), it should have the same support. It does: neither copyright law nor the copyright office defines classes of people (“artists” vs. “computer programmers”) with different effects on if they create artwork with the same type of automated tooling. The copyright office may make a spurious distinction between GenAI and other tools, but it doesn't distinction between classes of creator the way you seem to think is an issue that needs corrected.