4 ms·
Sure but if you look at male outcomes, we are clearly ignoring a lot of real health problems that are deadly, so 66% of males ignoring a less than deadly probl
by fatfingerd 3y ago
Sure but if you look at male outcomes, we are clearly ignoring a lot of real health problems that are deadly, so 66% of males ignoring a less than deadly problem that allows 8 hours of work a day seems more likely than a lot of female hypochondriacs to me.
- whimsicalism 3y agoThis argument could be applied to any condition with psychosomatic indicators. Your suggestion that somatically-involved conditions aren't 'real' is offensive and what gives rise to the stigma that means we can't talk about this in the first place.
- fatfingerd 3y agoThere's no telling what's real once you are willing to go down that route, least of all a doctors opinion. If someone stops displaying symptoms that could just be a non blinded doctor and a placebo. I think the offense is going there without any double blinded science and then relying on non reproducible fields of research to annoy the patient.