3 ms·

> What is the significant harm Stochastic terrorism.

• shadowgovt 3y ago
  That's a very good point and I have no arguments with it. Unfortunately, nothing about the California law really addresses it. The Fifth Circuit Court decision regarding coercion of social media sites will bind to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment, so California can't really enforce anything if they disagree with a company's moderation policy. That means the law reduces to perfunctory data collection, and it doesn't really tell consumers anything that logging into the site and going "Gee, this site sure is full of white supremacists advocating stochastic terrorism and nobody does anything about it" wouldn't tell them.
• jonhohle 3y ago
  Is not the same as actual terrorism.
  • DanHulton 3y ago
    Irrelevant, though, as it still causes harm, which is the original differentiator.