3 ms·
But the government isn't allowed to regulate the speech based on harm unless that harm would result from lawless action which is also incited by the speech and
by hellojesus 3y ago
But the government isn't allowed to regulate the speech based on harm unless that harm would result from lawless action which is also incited by the speech and probable to happen based on the speech.
- mrguyorama 3y agoPeople should really be more considering this as "Truth in advertising" type law. This isn't about whether Twitter follows it's policies as written, as you would be hard pressed to convict any company for merely not following it's own rules for something that isn't illegal (allowing inflammatory speech on your platform, or even signal boosting such speech), but more at requiring companies be honest about how they moderate their consumer participation. This law is so consumers can make educated choices about the platforms they want to use.