4 ms·
I agree, this seems fairly cut and dry. People are jumping past the law as written to downstream actions that become feasible for the state if the law exists. T
by Bjartr 3y ago
I agree, this seems fairly cut and dry. People are jumping past the law as written to downstream actions that become feasible for the state if the law exists. This required reporting isn't the problem to attack though, it's those downstream actions.
Now perhaps (probably) there should be a mechanism in place to stop the gov't from even getting this far, but, AFAIK, such a mechanism does not yet exist and it's certainly not the first amendment.