4 ms·
Where can I pay for information presented in such a short, clear and to-the-point manner? Preferably human generated as well (no to robots). I dream about havi
by badtension 3y ago
Where can I pay for information presented in such a short, clear and to-the-point manner? Preferably human generated as well (no to robots).
I dream about having access to this kind of internet.
- screamingninja 3y agoHacker News, of course! :) I am curious though, why human generated only? AI is getting better at summarizing everyday. Does it really matter if you cannot tell the difference?
- badtension 3y agoI am not an expert in modern NLP SOTA but from what I see these models do not work that well. You didn't summarize the article but took some of the most important points and shared what really mattered. It may not be perfect but required a real life experience. I am afraid there will always be a chance of getting "techno-babble" from our models, at least until they we get to some sort of AGI. Look at your first line: > Most of the article appears to be about what does not work. No model will decide to include that info and it is vital for me to understand why you chose just a few lines out of it. We are still long way out from trusting in reliable LLMs.
- PartiallyTyped 3y agoThere are two things to that answer; first, a summary: > Most of the article appears to be about what does not work. and then a segmentation, where they list the content. This is very much in line with LLMs can do. Segmentation is part of a standard QA benchmark, and summaries are obviously something we have. You can also ask a model to not only identify a summary, but segment only the relevant parts given the summary. The "difficulty" is in pairing the two LLMs together.
- fouc 3y agoI asked chatgpt to pick the most important 2 or 3 lines of text from the article. It returned: 1. "Fortunately, there is advice out there on how to break the ice with strangers. Unfortunately, it’s abysmal." 2. "Making contacts on a site like LinkedIn is a lot less stressful." 3. "The real secret is to save your energy for the people who are most likely to be interesting to you." It got 2 out of 3 wrong basically. I'm not sure how to objectively measure/improve that in an automated way. I suppose some prompt might do better though? I guess a second pass of the results through another LLM could potentially help like you suggest?
- AnimalMuppet 3y agoBecause AI is going to give me a summary of what the article said. I don't want that. I want a summary of the relevant parts of what the article said. And if it's appropriate, I want a cynical, "this is baloney/marketing/clickbait/propaganda" summary.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- carapace 3y ago> Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.
- graypegg 3y agoSome sort of LLM could work for you! It’s not a half bad idea for a browser extension or something if it doesn’t already exist.
- magic_hamster 3y agoI've seen it mostly in finance websites, where they often have keynotes at the top for a quick glance. I think the last time I've seen in this in a different context was probably an article in The Verge.
- badtension 3y agoI love when scientific articles list "Key Points" and "Plain Language Summary" right at the top: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GB007875 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GB00...
- podgorniy 3y agoShortform tries to do such things. For me chatgpt v4 is a good summarizer.