3 ms·

Which insightful questions did you see in this article? In which ways did they provoke your thoughts?

• wolverine876 3y ago
  They raised the issue, which I hardly every see raised, that disabling the feature may not disable data collection. The gave compelling examples of both sides, rather than dismissing one or being inflammatory - the dental hygine example was great, a little personal. They clearly and efficiently spelled out the different modes. They brought up Firefox and the much more obscure Brave, and even more privacy-oriented browsers. It was great. I'd give it to lay-people who were interested, and as a technical person I don't need to read more.
  • inetknght 3y ago
    > the dental hygine example was great, a little personal. It can be better solved with a calendar notification. No privacy violated and you can add your own information to your notification: you liked this toothbrush, your dentist recommended that toothbrush, you didn't like this store, blah blah. Is there value in that? Sure. Does that mean that value must be extracted by a business? No.
    • wolverine876 3y ago
      I wouldn't use it myself, but I couldn't say what is 'better' for other people. Some will prefer Chrome helping them. Lots of people do things that I don't. Regardless, that's a debate to have with Chrome devs. It's already in the browser and the article is reporting on the browser.