3 ms·

I think it was rather obvious from the context of this thread that the quoted text indicates that the article linked is of very poor quality. It is not necessar

I think it was rather obvious from the context of this thread that the quoted text indicates that the article linked is of very poor quality. It is not necessary to read the full article before knowing something is of poor quality which is trivially known by anyone who has started reading a book or article and then decided it was not worth their time. I read the article that I suggested was better and I stand by that statement.

wolverine876 3y ago
> I think it was rather obvious from the context of this thread that the quoted text indicates that the article linked is of very poor quality. I read the article; it's actually one of the better pieces I've read in that domain (tech news for the general public) IMHO. People say those things (take-downs) about everything on HN. Don't trust the threads - why would you trust anonymous people writing one-sentence hot-take rants, some of whom probably also didn't read the article and are just repeating things. The Internet tide isn't a reliable indicator of anything, any more than the tide at the beach.