4 ms·
Good for you. I left, too. They don't even offer redirects to a new location of the removed project, lol. Forced 2FA on everyone is non-sense. Everyone should
by megous 3y ago
Good for you. I left, too. They don't even offer redirects to a new location of the removed project, lol.
Forced 2FA on everyone is non-sense. Everyone should decide on their own what is enough security. All I had was a Linux repo mirror, with signed tags for tested releases of my kernel branches.
Zero security issues with that distribution method. 2FA is only useful for veryfying user logins, not repo content.
Anyway, they can do whatever they want. GIT is thankfully fully distributed repository management system, so github.com is quite optional.
- CableNinja 3y agoFWIW gitlab has also done similar. I think MFA is important for something like code repositories.
- megous 3y agoGitlab has the best security. They don't even let me to the login page. https://megous.com/dl/tmp/egrdxmmfuiakyhkodsok.webm https://megous.com/dl/tmp/egrdxmmfuiakyhkodsok.webm This is what you get if you pay, too. > I think MFA is important for something like code repositories. I think it's not, because they can't be secured by it. As a code user I can't be sure repo was not tampered with, just because some service promises to use 2FA to authorize developer access to the repo.