> Did you know that the word consensus does not include the word unanimous? Yes. Did you remember that you wrote this? > oh but it is and you'd have to be as

> Did you know that the word consensus does not include the word unanimous? Yes. Did you remember that you wrote this? > oh but it is and you'd have to be as obtuse as my reviewers to argue differently. like bro there isn't a scholar/thinker/activist on this subject anywhere in the world that agrees with you (politicians definitely agreew with you though). If you would like to share the reasons for your opinion about academic peer review, feel free. > One of my favorite things is when someone is either so pretentious or so clueless as to reject a (gender neutral) colloquialism. Huh, so it is. https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=48576 https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=48576 Mark me down for 'clueless'. I'd seen that with “girlie” and “guy” (perhaps coincidentally, both of which match historical uses of the words), but not “bro”. It's not listed in Wiktionary (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bro#English https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bro#English), but it looks WT:ATTEST-able: do you have a definition that could go there?