4 ms·

You are basically ignore the laws of physics. There will never be a airplane with decent range running on conventional batteries. Even now, battery powered airp

• eru 3y ago
  What do you mean by 'conventional batteries'? You need to add some assumption so that you can say powering a plane with them is physically impossible. I made the original comment contemporary batteries ain't good for electric planes. And I would not bet on batteries becoming good enough anytime soon. But I don't think physics prohibits anything here?
  • _hypx 3y ago
    Anything that works like existing rechargeable batteries. Those would be considered conventional batteries. There is basically no path to a high enough energy density for airplanes for those types of batteries. Things that involve metal-air reactions are basically fuel cells and don't count. If you go down that route, you'll quickly find yourself working with some kind of chemical fuel. They will suddenly look a lot like existing airplanes in terms of basic concept.
    • eru 3y ago
      > Anything that works like existing rechargeable batteries. Those would be considered conventional batteries. Ok, that definition works. I would have gone with 'whatever people (in the future or now) use for powering their phones, laptops and electric cars' is by definition 'conventional' at that point in time.