4 ms·

Dew point over 70 doesn't sound that high? I live in Vietnam. It is 8am right now and the dew point is 80. It only 80 at the moment but is supposed to get up t

Dew point over 70 doesn't sound that high? I live in Vietnam. It is 8am right now and the dew point is 80. It only 80 at the moment but is supposed to get up to 90 later in the day. I assume the dew point will also go up to around 90. AccuWeather says the "RealFeel" will be 97 and "RealFeel Shade" will also be 97, so being in the shade does almost nothing, since it is overcast and raining very slightly at the moment. We're not in a heat wave or anything, this is just normal weather basically year round. If anything it's been especially rainy and cool the past few weeks. Trees are nice but are not remotely a substitute for air conditioning. Trees do not lower humidity enough to stop the average European/American from sweating constantly just sitting still here.

spongebobstoes 3y ago
of course trees are not a substitute for air conditioning. but, on a sunny day a street heavily shaded by trees is significantly cooler than the same street with no trees. this is true no matter how hot out it is that's not to say that the heat under a trees' shade cannot still be oppressive. merely that shade matters, as the existence of two "RealFeel" measurements you shared indicates
- freddie_mercury 3y ago
  > of course trees are not a substitute for air conditioning Well the whole thread was something arguing they are. First post: "I love trees and want more of them in our cities, my only point is that they are not usually a substitute for HVAC" Reply: "I guess we disagree on what trees do well"
  - kgermino 3y ago
    Going back to the beginning what started this is a debate about whether trees cool cities. I don’t think anyone (certainly not me) has intended to argue that trees can replace AC, just that they make the city around them (including indoors in many cases) much cooler than they would be without the trees
glitchc 3y ago
Vietnam is sub-tropical, not directly comparable. Better to compare Vietnam to itself, with and without trees. How much hotter is it in the city compared to the jungle?

spongebobstoes 3y ago

of course trees are not a substitute for air conditioning. but, on a sunny day a street heavily shaded by trees is significantly cooler than the same street with no trees. this is true no matter how hot out it is that's not to say that the heat under a trees' shade cannot still be oppressive. merely that shade matters, as the existence of two "RealFeel" measurements you shared indicates

freddie_mercury 3y ago
> of course trees are not a substitute for air conditioning Well the whole thread was something arguing they are. First post: "I love trees and want more of them in our cities, my only point is that they are not usually a substitute for HVAC" Reply: "I guess we disagree on what trees do well"
- kgermino 3y ago
  Going back to the beginning what started this is a debate about whether trees cool cities. I don’t think anyone (certainly not me) has intended to argue that trees can replace AC, just that they make the city around them (including indoors in many cases) much cooler than they would be without the trees

glitchc 3y ago

Vietnam is sub-tropical, not directly comparable. Better to compare Vietnam to itself, with and without trees. How much hotter is it in the city compared to the jungle?