4 ms·
One of the interesting things for me about the hypothesis is that if humans had developed better food preservation techniques this outcome might have been diffe
by ChuckMcM 3y ago
One of the interesting things for me about the hypothesis is that if humans had developed better food preservation techniques this outcome might have been different. Specifically a lot of large animals would rot before one could finish eating them so the rate of consumption was higher than strictly necessary. (not that early humans cared, but later humans developed a wide range of preservation methods due to scarcity pressures it seems).
- SoftTalker 3y agoI think more to be able to live in climates where hunting, foraging, or farming year-round was not possible.
- jahewson 3y agoEarly humans were nomadic. They had no need to stay in the same place year-round. Just follow the animals.