That goes without saying. edit: I don't like your linked article at all. Subtly misleading and/or misinformed. Like a yahoo news but for ML. to clarify: No on

That goes without saying. edit: I don't like your linked article at all. Subtly misleading and/or misinformed. Like a yahoo news but for ML. to clarify: No one (certainly not OpenAI) suggested that RLHF was useful for reducing hallucinations. It's not for that. The insinuation that it was designed for that purpose (at least partially) and yet "failed" is a faulty one. It was not designed for that purpose. Hallucinations are a known issue with large language models, and while I appreciate LeCunn re-iterating that; lesser researchers than LeCunn are aware of that fact.