3 ms·
Certainly not after the vote. The is a violation of democracy. But it they didn't have to propose it. And they didn't have to advertise it. And it would be on
by gretch 3y ago
Certainly not after the vote. The is a violation of democracy.
But it they didn't have to propose it. And they didn't have to advertise it.
And it would be one thing if all sides earnestly believed the benefits - instead better members of the party should have checked the dumb ideas (this is the point of parties)
- petre 3y agoWell, they advertised and proposed it rather than losing votes (quite a predictable party move, Nigel knew that too). I'm pretty sure Cameron believed it would never pass. But it did. That's why he quit afterwards. It was one of those "oh shit" moments.