So, for example, we have cleared forests to make way for farmland. Reversing that would increase the total amount of carbon held. Perhaps I should have said in

So, for example, we have cleared forests to make way for farmland. Reversing that would increase the total amount of carbon held. Perhaps I should have said increasing the amount of equilibrium biomass or something to more clearly include rewilding or ecosystem changes. It’s not just plants that are a carbon store, after all. I don’t think this is likely to represent a full solution, if that is the subtext to your comment.