3 ms·
>What if you are disabled and have no train connectivity? Ok, then you can have a car. Everyone else still can't. >What about workers who need to travel by ca
by amrocha 3y ago
>What if you are disabled and have no train connectivity?
Ok, then you can have a car. Everyone else still can't.
>What about workers who need to travel by car to build trains? What about support workers who help those workers? And so on?
Company provided shuttle buses.
See what happens if we stop virtue signaling and think for a few more seconds?
- cscurmudgeon 3y ago> , then you can have a car See how silly that sounds? These are just two things I thought of quickly. You will end up with ten thousand rules and caveats if we think a bit more. Why wasn't this included in the original comment? If you propose rules, make them at least 50% complete! > Company provided shuttle buses. TIL buses are equal to trains and cycles. Also shuttles will pollute more if they are sparsely occupied which is common. You should read about Mao's idiocy. We shouldn't repeat similar idiocy in 2023.
- amrocha 3y agoMate, nobody's writing comprehensive laws in the hacker news comment section. Stop engaging in bad faith. The rest of your comment is also wrong, and I'm sure you know why if you stop to think about it for 30 seconds.