> TFA lists various ways use of a non-MFi charger could have. Sure, I guess Apple could limit non-MFi chargers/cables, in which case I'll get suitably upset. B

> TFA lists various ways use of a non-MFi charger could have. Sure, I guess Apple could limit non-MFi chargers/cables, in which case I'll get suitably upset. But (1) as I say, we collectively have several years of experience with this, and (2) this is an anonymous "leaker" via Forbes, who I don't have a ton of respect for. https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/02/an-incomplete-history-of-forbes-com-as-a-platform-for-scams-grift-and-bad-journalism/ https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/02/an-incomplete-history-of-f... I think Apple will promote the use of MFi chargers/cables for pragmatic reasons — they eliminate risk, guarantee the best possible user experience, and reduce support costs simply by ensuring that they correctly support USB-C/USB 4.