> This wasnt the government suing Twitter for defamation. I never said it was. The point was simply to refute GP's blanket assertion that any restriction on sp

> This wasnt the government suing Twitter for defamation. I never said it was. The point was simply to refute GP's blanket assertion that any restriction on speech is tantamount to tyranny. > There are exceptions to the rule and this wasnt one of then. That's a thornier question which has not been resolved yet, and is certainly not a black-and-white issue.