3 ms·

I mean, both of them are misogynistic because they’re financial transactions in which one is exchanging ownership of a woman.

• gruez 3y ago
  By that framing the issue seems to be the "exchanging ownership of a woman" part than the "financial" part.
  • ethanbond 3y ago
    The issue is "ownership of a woman" or generally "ownership of a person." What on earth is hard to understand here?
    • gruez 3y ago
      That's literally what I said in the comment you replied to? >the issue seems to be the "exchanging ownership of a woman" part
  • roughly 3y ago
    You’re right, I shouldn’t have specified “financial.”