3 ms·
Yes of course. But that is not the picture painted by many online. How often haven't you read "Arch has been rock solid"? This is not what the arch homepage sa
by bjoli 3y ago
Yes of course. But that is not the picture painted by many online. How often haven't you read "Arch has been rock solid"?
This is not what the arch homepage says, which explicitly says that it is not the job of the distro to ensure compatibility between updates.
- kjs3 3y agoIndeed. "You should just run Arch" is giving "just rewrite everything in Rust" a run for it's money, especially since the "Mill will solve all of those pesky CS problems" folks have gone quiet.
- seba_dos1 3y agoIn my experience Arch has been pretty solid indeed (not as solid as, say, Debian sid, but close enough), but that assumes that you do read the news pages before upgrading and that you know how to deal with AUR well. Otherwise it's not Arch's fault when it breaks :P