4 ms·
> It’s an amazing bit of history. Sure, it's the obsessing over conspiracy theories that I don't get. There's no way to verify the various speculations, so wha
by PrimeMcFly 3y ago
> It’s an amazing bit of history.
Sure, it's the obsessing over conspiracy theories that I don't get. There's no way to verify the various speculations, so what's the point?
- diogenes4 3y agoThere's no way (for most of us with finite resources) to verify the vast majority of history, even recent history, even history that happened today. To me this is like saying "who cares what may or may not have happened in the past". This particular conspiracy theory is interesting because the assumed enemy here—the Soviet Union—was ostensibly (and seeming authentically) unhappy to see this happen. So who wanted JFK dead and why?
- PrimeMcFly 3y ago> There's no way (for most of us with finite resources) to verify the vast majority of history, even recent history, even history that happened today. That's an entirely different issue. > So who wanted JFK dead and why? Again, Occam says Oswald.
- diogenes4 3y ago[dead]
- JPws_Prntr_Fngr 3y agoFair enough, as long as you leave the thinking and decision-making to people who have even a modicum of historical curiosity.