I said “it’s not any weirder than promoting rust under discussions about c++”. That’s not claiming you said something about promoting rust, that’s asserting tha

I said “it’s not any weirder than promoting rust under discussions about c++”. That’s not claiming you said something about promoting rust, that’s asserting that if you have any consistency then you should find that weird as well. The title of the post asks how constexpr c++ strings are. I answered with “more than rust’s”. The existence of const fn has yet to prove me incorrect.