Sure, man. Also the libs are coming to force you to get gay married and to steal your guns. This appeals court decision barely supported any of the overreach o

Sure, man. Also the libs are coming to force you to get gay married and to steal your guns. This appeals court decision barely supported any of the overreach of the trial judge; and as a well-known super-conservative circuit, they're using the opportunity to grind their own political axe by paying homage to the current Fox News-promoted talking points. If you think this decision isn't political, compare it to similar attempts in the past when the give has requested compliance from media in exchange for favors or threats. Or contrast it to the conspicuous silence from the "anti-censorship" crowd when conservative governors gut their state's educational system and destroy programs that teach subjects they find politically objectionable. And apparently you've bought into that narrative entirely, as soon as you call anyone with a bit more historical perspective "pro-censorship." I'm not "pro-censorship", whatever that means. What I see is a good-faith if inept attempt to combat massive, coordinated, and dangerous misinformation, an activity that falls well within the gov's purview.