> you very much said so in words. Intentional or not, you explicitly said that only the worst or least competent employees remained: >>Grindr is hollowing itse

> you very much said so in words. Intentional or not, you explicitly said that only the worst or least competent employees remained: >>Grindr is hollowing itself out in terms of talent and it’s best employees, leaving only the sub-par and desperate. So the word “desperate” does not exist in that sentence? Because it is a valid word, separate and distinct from “sub-par”. Plus, “desperate” does not equal “sub-par”. A simple dictionary can teach you that. The word “and” between then indicates that each type of person is present in the group that remains, it is not an either-or group that consists of only one type of person or another. Some will be sub-par. Others will be desperate. I strongly recommend you brush up on your comprehension of the English language, as it appears to not be your native tongue.