3 ms·
I see no reason why not. You would need to represent dyadic relationships and whether they are reciprocal, transitive, etc., weigh probabilities about the inte
by thereticent 3y ago
I see no reason why not. You would need to represent dyadic relationships and whether they are reciprocal, transitive, etc., weigh probabilities about the intended meaning (LLM magic already), then use sentential logic rules, right?